The Handsomest Drowned Man in the World
Gabriel García
Márquez
"Uses magic realism but has a reality behind
it"
The first thing that struck me when I first finished reading the story was that the fictional society is oddly similar to the modern society where lookism is rampant in our daily lives. Such conclusion was driven by the way people behave towards the dead man, or such attitude and how influential a single person can be. The evidences are emphasized in the following points.
Just as the women finished cleaning up the
body, they are shocked by the extremely handsome appearance of the dead man,
establishing a blind stereotype of him: "But
only when they finished cleaning him off did they become aware of the kind of
man he was and it left them breathless. Not only was he the tallest, strongest,
most virile, and best built man they had ever seen, but even though they were
looking at him there was no room for him in their imagination."
With the bias deeply engraved in their
minds, the women are willing to do anything for the dead man, slowly becoming
big "fans" of him: "Fascinated by his huge size and his beauty,
the women then decided to make him some pants from a large piece of sail and a
shirt from some bridal Brabant linen so that he could continue through his
death with dignity." The "fans" in the story is quite similar to
"fans" today, who intend to serve their favorite celebrities as gods
or goddesses. There are cases in which these fans send expensive or otherwise
valuable gifts such as laptops and drawings of the celebrity, the situation
that is similar to the women making some pants from a large piece of sail and a
shirt from some bridal Brabant linen.
The women are slowly and thoroughly
manipulated by the stereotypes they established themselves, now starting to
freely imagine what he was like when he was alive. The speculation has no
evidence at all, but they come up with specific words he would have said or
detailed behavior he would have shown and how others would have reacted to him.
According to the women, he felt sorry for his own size wherever he went, not
sitting anywhere lest he might break the chair he sat on. Also, his big size
made him uncomfortable, "condemned
to going through doors sideways, cracking his head on crossbeams." The
women also thought that if that magnificent man had lived in the village, his
house would have had the widest doors, the highest ceiling, and the strongest
floor, his bedstead would have been made from a midship frame held together by
iron bolts, and his wife would have been the happiest woman.
This state of the women, acting overly nice
to the dead man and now making up whole stories of him when he was alive, reflects
the desire to become familiar with every little detail of the handsome drowned
man's life. The similar kind of desire is also shown by the "big
fans" or "paparazzi" today, who are willing to sacrifice
anything to get information on current state of the celebrity. The desire is
exactly why the paparazzi and privacy exposure of celebrities have become one
of the most critical problems in modern society.
The women then assume that the man was good
natured when he was alive, just by looking at his handsome outer appearance. The
assumption, of course, does not make any sense, with no proof that can back up
their stories. We make the same mistake today, automatically and unconsciously
assuming that handsome or beautiful people have such good personalities. Furthermore,
when the women come to learn that the drowned man is not from the neighbor
area, they sighs, "Praise the Lord," "He's ours!"
It is simply amazing how influential a
single person can be. Given by the fact that the village people held the most
splendid funeral for him and that they also "chose a father and mother
from among the best people, and aunts and uncles and cousins, so that through
him all the inhabitants of the village became kinsmen," the author is not
only trying to emphasize the great impact the dead man has on the whole
village, but also trying to lead the readers into thinking that this is
ridiculous. By showing the ridiculous circumstances through the description of
the story for the readers, the author may be trying to leave the readers laugh
at the fictional society, thereby giving them a chance to laugh at, or look
back on their own society. With rational thinking, worshipping a dead man and
establishing kinship with the dead man are all extremely weird and in some
ways grotesque. In this case, the author in this story most effectively
delivered the lesson for his readers, both making up irrational and funny
scenes to laugh at using magic realism, and emphasizing the huge impact the
dead man has on the whole village, especially when the women thought, "…
it seemed to them that the wind had never been so steady nor the sea so
restless as on that night and they supposed that the change had something to do
with the dead man," or in the last sentence, "… yes, over there,
that's Esteban's village."
The point that you caught about how a single man can influence the people (the women) is quite fascinating. And I must agree, of course, that Esteban indeed have a great influence over the village.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I would disagree with the idea that this is "ridiculous". I thought, in contrast, (this is what partly my journal is about) what Esteban brings to the village is quite positive. By worshiping a dead man (of course, the action itself is ridiculous), they earn some sort of idealistic crave towards beauty and revere the man because of his significant stature. Yet, the kinship that they earn after time passed didn't make them suddenly change their opinions towards the man to "grotesque". They still revere the man. What changed, however, is the perceptions of the people - if they originally thought that the beauty the dead man had could not be imitated because it was "too great", now due to the kinship they are able to follow and adapt that beauty to broaden their imagination - which ultimately brought change to the village. I don't really think that this part was evoking some irony or wit, but rather a profound meaning of how a village can change. But overall, I enjoyed reading a journal that had different thoughts with me :)
it is ridiculous, and it is also valid. Though Esteban was able to instill "hope" and pride back into the village, it is ridiculous that a "dead" entity did so, and it is ridiculous that they invented a past for him. Sound familiar? A bit like Jesus? A handsome man people claim to know existed? A handsome man people wrote a history for? A handsome man who offers commoners (especially women) a form of hope? A handsome man who is "claimed" by millions of people with thousands of different beliefs about who he was and what he stood for? Jesus was the original Pop Star, and if he is floating out on the ocean of the universe, many "hope" he comes back and visits again. That's just my opinion, which has a lot in common with yours. Nice job staying clear, Minsun. One thing you should try and do more of is be specific when you can be specific. You refer to Marquez as "the author" throughout, but you would sound more credible if you stated his name as clearly you do the excerpts from his text. Not a big deal, but it does help to be specific.
ReplyDeleteyes
ReplyDeleteyes
ReplyDelete